I am troubled.
I am troubled by Elder Boyd K. Packer’s General Conference speech on Sunday. It was the one message I heard from General conference. I wish I had not. The uproar from LDS members and non-members is everywhere, so it was not hard to listen. Each day another person gives an opinion on the topic. Today I add my thoughts. I want to start by saying that I think the general authorities are good men who try their best. I even believe that they are and can be inspirational. They definitely do good things. But, they are also human with their own biases and opinions. So I ask, can they be wrong? Of course, the answer is yes. I could list tons of examples where the LDS leaders and the church has altered its views; even changing a view "that the church [has] been saying for the last 2 decades. Yep DECADES!!" And so could you. But this, is not about what was said. It is about how it was said.
And that is why I am confused.
I am confused because, Packard’s speech, for me, was contrary to what other LDS leaders have been doing and saying. It was contrary to how I feel the church and its members are. It was contrary to what I had been observing after prop 8. Prop 8 and the LDS involvement scared and hurt neighbors, wards, and families. Due to this, some LDS members brought groups together to educate and resolve these hurts. At one meeting where 13 gay and straight Mormons spoke “There was sobbing. There were tears. Elder Jensen also shed tears as he listened and took notes to share with other General Authorities back in Salt Lake City. At the conclusion of the hour, he apologized for the pain he was witnessing.” LDS leaders cried alongside a group of LDS and gay youth. Loving them for who they are. Observing and listening to their struggles. Gaining greater understanding for the gay individual and the LDS families that include gay and lesbian individuals. You can find more to this story here. This does not mean that I thought the LDS church changed its views but this behavior better reflected how I feel these contradictory beliefs, between the LGBT community and yours, should be handled. Unfortunately, Elder Packer's talk seemed determined to change that and for what?
His speech only caused pain.
Packard gave a “license to hate” homosexuals or to at least look down upon them. Some have said, “He did MUCH more damage with his talk to more people than he helped. A heterosexual married person certainly wasn't helped by his talk. A gay LDS boy struggling with feelings of inadequacy was certainly harmed - hopefully not to the point of suicide - but it was a bad, demeaning talk.” I think this is true. It will have an affect on those struggling with who they are, what they believe of themselves, and how society accepts them. This struggle took 3-4 young boys last month as they ended their lives. Unable to go on and face the hate and lack of acceptance from those who surrounded them. The words Packard spoke were preached as living scripture; a message from god. There is a great weight to any word he speaks and he sent a message to be interpreted and used as fuel to the bigots and prejudice among us against. And its already starting "There's no such thing as gay people. It defies the laws of nature. It's like defying gravity, don't you know?" I read this in the news regarding gay rights. These are Packard's words. Would you say this statement to anyone you know? Now, how about a gay or lesbian child? And yet, we accept these same words from a church leader who is responsible spread the word and represent the love of Christ. The weight of this, for me, hangs heavy.
I am happy to hear that Packers speech has already been altered on the LDS website. The words softened but the message still clear. Like I said... its not what was said that has everyone upset. It was how it was said.
Angie
Well I consider myself a 'LDS friend or family' of managed chaos so this post was directed to me, so I guess I should reply. ;) First let me say that I love being your friend, I love you and respect you. I love that we disagree. Your arguments and opinions, make me think, they help me to articulate and formulate my own opinions and beliefs. I love that we can disagree and still be friends. The rest of the community can learn a lot from that.
ReplyDeleteI'm confused too. I'm confused why everyone was so upset by Elder Packards speech. I have also heard it a number of times and I can't find where the "license to hate" or look down upon them was. I agree with you that it wasn't what he said that was different but how he said it. I also think in today's culture he had to say it the way he did, clearly, unequivocally, definitively: homosexuality is morally wrong. But think about it; if he had said (like the church has and will continue to say) that it was wrong, but there was nothing you could do to change and you had no choice, how much more damaging would that have been to someone struggling with homosexual feelings within the church? What he did say was that you can change, there is hope, you can go to heaven, there is a way back. Every church will always preach that you have a choice. To me that is what Elder Packer was saying, when he said they weren't born that way.
The thing that hangs heavy for me is the hate that I feel from the LGBT community. These are the people who want acceptance and tolerance but who can't seem to accept me or tolerate me for believing something different from what they believe. They want to stop the hate, but if I speak out then I'm called homophobic, close minded, uneducated, bigot, and hateful. My church tells me to love ALL my neighbors, whether or not other members of my church do or not, that is what they tell me to do. I can and have befriend, worked with, respected, and loved someone who was gay. Can they befriend, worked with respected and love me, even if I think homosexuality is morally wrong?
Lets focus on what we have in common. Lets all work together to stop the bullying, stop the discrimination, stop the hate. I think we can do that and still disagree. Do you?